Fairfax County Supervisors Take Formal Position on Tysons Casino

Trending 2 months ago

Posted on: January 29, 2024, 03:34h. 

Last updated on: January 29, 2024, 12:02h.

Avatar photo

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors says they weren’t privy to legislative discussions astir perchance allowing a casino edifice successful Tysons. That’s earlier a powerful authorities Senator revenge a measure successful Richmond earlier this month.

Fairfax casino Virginia legislationThe Fairfax County Board of Supervisors airs for a photograph up of their first gathering connected Jan. 23, 2024. The section authorities officials successful Virginia person formally travel retired successful guidance to legislative efforts to bring a casino to Tysons. (Image: Fairfax County)

On Friday nighttime — facing nan wrath of residents for seemingly not taking a position connected Virginia authorities Sen. David Marsden’s (D-Fairfax) nationalist support for a casino successful Tysons — Fairfax supervisors told their constituents nan legislative push was news to them, too.

What happened present is that group successful a vacuum worked connected a scheme and went to Richmond without coordinating pinch Fairfax County,” Jeff McKay, nan chair of nan region board, told DC News Now. “None of those groups person travel formally, sat down pinch maine and said, ‘Hey, here’s what we’re proposing. This is what our measure looks like. Will Fairfax County prosecute successful conversations pinch us?'”

The mostly of nan region supervisors expressed guidance toward a possible casino successful Tysons. The supervisors subsequently drafted and sent a missive to respective authorities lawmakers to definitive nan county’s hostility to Marsden’s gaming legislation.

County Submits Position

In nan county’s missive by McKay, nan supervisors opportunity they didn’t instantly return a position connected nan rumored casino legislation. That’s because Virginia is simply a Dillon Rule authorities that restricts section governments’ authority. The chair said that’s why nan Fairfax County Board of Supervisors doesn’t typically clasp aliases reason legislation.

However, erstwhile it comes to a imaginable casino, nan supervisors opportunity they should person a spot astatine nan table.

“Unlike different jurisdictions that received nan authority to clasp a referendum to big a casino, Fairfax County did not activity specified authority and has not been substantively progressive successful nan improvement of nan casino conception envisioned by stakeholders and nan patron of nan legislation,” McKay wrote to House Speaker Don Scott (D-Portsmouth), House Majority Leader Charniele Herring (D-Alexandria), House Minority Leader Todd Gilbert (R-Woodstock), Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Mount Vernon), and Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle (R-Mechanicsville).

It apt comes arsenic nary astonishment to you that nan location and conception included successful nan authorities and reported successful nan media has generated important organization interest and opposition,” McKay continued. “Furthermore, since a organization engagement process was not conducted anterior to nan measure being introduced arsenic it was successful different jurisdictions, we judge nan measure successful its existent shape is apt to consequence successful beardown organization guidance to nan early referendum.”

McKay countered Marsden’s claims that a casino is needed to prevention Fairfax County’s spot taxation base, which was dealt gross setbacks because of COVID-19 and much workers being allowed to telework. McKay said nan supervisors “are assured that Tysons is poised for continued success” and will proceed to pull caller businesses to its galore agency buildings.

McKay didn’t inquire for immoderate action by nan lawmakers but alternatively said nan committee decided to taxable nan unsolicited grounds astir its stance connected nan casino dilemma.   

Widespread Opposition

County supervisors said Friday that they’ve fielded a slew of opposition from organization members and small support.

“I’m not proceeding a batch of different things from my constituents. I’m proceeding uniformed opposition,” said Fairfax Supervisor James Bierman, representing nan Dranesville District.

McKay said nan 4 different casinos approved successful Virginia person conscionable a 4th of nan gross gross won by nan house.

“If this casino generated $200 cardinal and only $50 cardinal of that came backmost to Fairfax County, and I was near pinch each nan problems related to a casino? That’s not a bully woody for my taxpayers. We’re not successful this to beryllium nan state’s ATM.”

Marsden said he’s been publically discussing nan thought of authoring authorities to designate Fairfax arsenic a casino big for complete a year. He says nan casino would beryllium only 1 constituent of nan project, arsenic nan destination would besides bring much-needed nightlife, entertainment, and a ample normal halfway to Tysons.

Marsden says nan casino would besides springiness people successful Northern Virginia a spot to gamble different than walking to neighboring Maryland.

Marsden’s Fairfax casino statute, Senate Bill 675, passed nan Senate General Laws and Technology Committee last week by a 10-4 vote. The measure has since moved to nan Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee.

Source Casino news
Casino news